I had my dog neutered this week. I know that may sound
peculiar to mention but as I desperately tried to get my research paper
finished, I started to think about things that have nothing to do with research
papers but that impact them greatly. I know, I know … very tangential thoughts
but so too are dog park gate systems :-).
I think as I felt sorry for my whining dog who gave up his parts, I considered
the parts of our creativity that we give up as researchers as well. We may
start off with what we consider to be creative and innovative ideas and then as
the research takes off, we realize that some of those ideas really just won’t
work. As we whittle off parts of a research plan, things become more evident …
ideas that we thought were brilliant suddenly appear to be disconnected. I
think the connections between parts of research are pretty important but
funnily enough, I feel like this comprehension didn’t happen for me until the
very end of the course. This is not a complaint but instead something akin to
an epiphany. I feel like the connections that were made in preparing a proposal
are something I can definitely take with me into other courses or other
research opportunities. Like Amanda’s observations below on magic versus the
transparency of methodology, I think it is important to admit or perhaps expose
how unorthodox methods or just plain crazy ideas sometimes mark the beginnings
of good research.
No comments:
Post a Comment