Since in class we are
discussing proposals, I found chapter five of Luker to be relevant. Where she
discusses literature reviews and the daunting task of reviewing literature
through out the whole process of research, not just at the beginning. In my undergraduate degree, I never
found literature reviews to be too difficult because I could always find five
to ten articles on the topic. However I was never conducting my own research,
just writing a review for class, so I never realized how big a job this would
actually be. When conducting real research you would really want to find the
most relevant and up to date publications. Luker’s point that you may not even
know what field you are writing in, is so true. For example, if you were writing about the effects poverty have on civil unrest,
it may appear to be a political science interest, but could be more related to
peace studies. I think this is really important to keep in mind when we start
writing our proposals. I also enjoyed how one of her tips is “make friends with
a reference librarian” as I am sure many of the people in our class are LIS stream.
It’s interesting that she mentions “your job is to analyze information; a
librarians job is to help you find it in the first place”, where this is
limiting as many MLS graduates get research jobs, and they in fact analyze the
information. However in truth I relate to this because it is the “chase” I like best, not so much analysis.
Exactly! I thought (as a librarian) I would be HELPING people find their research and less about doing my own research! Hence the professional degree. However, I have learned that this program is much more about thinking with an academic mind rather than as a practitioner. By that I mean, we have to learn to think about and understand theorists to help inform us of the practices we will take on. Only once we begin our careers (public/private/corporate sectors) will these academic methodologies infer how to chase information.
ReplyDelete